In the world of cybersecurity, there are two frameworks that are widely used to help organizations manage and understand cyber threats: MITRE ATT&CK and NIST. While both frameworks are designed to help organizations improve their cybersecurity posture, they have different approaches and focus on different aspects of the cybersecurity landscape. In this article, we’ll explore the similarities and differences between MITRE ATT&CK and NIST.
What is MITRE ATT&CK?
MITRE ATT&CK (Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge) is a framework that provides a comprehensive taxonomy of adversary tactics and techniques. It was developed by the MITRE Corporation, a not-for-profit organization that works to advance public interests in science and engineering. MITRE ATT&CK is widely used by cybersecurity professionals to understand and respond to cyber threats.
What is NIST?
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a non-regulatory federal agency that develops and promotes standards and guidelines for a wide range of industries, including cybersecurity. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a set of guidelines designed to help organizations improve their cybersecurity posture.
How do MITRE ATT&CK and NIST differ?
MITRE ATT&CK and NIST are both important frameworks for managing and understanding cybersecurity risks. While they have different approaches and target different audiences, they can be used together to provide a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity management. Organizations can use MITRE ATT&CK to gain a detailed understanding of adversary behavior, and then use the NIST CSF to develop a comprehensive cybersecurity management plan that addresses these threats. Ultimately, it’s essential for organizations to prioritize cybersecurity and use these frameworks to continuously improve their cybersecurity posture.
